Jharkhand High Court
WPC/3805/2009 of TIRLOK NATH GUPTA Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS on 5 October 2026
) 1 W.P.(S) No. 3805 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3805 of 2009 ------ Tirlok Nath Gupta, son of Late Devi Prasad Gupta, resident of Matri Mandir, Dangal Para, P.S. Dumka Town, District Dumka, at present working as Sub Inspector of Police, Vigilance
( 2026:JHHC:29713 )
1
W.P.(S) No. 3805 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 3805 of 2009
------
Tirlok Nath Gupta, son of Late Devi Prasad Gupta, resident of Matri Mandir, Dangal Para, P.S. Dumka Town, District Dumka, at present working as Sub Inspector of Police, Vigilance Bureau, Audre House, Kanke Road, Ranchi.
....
....
….
Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi.
3. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Headquarters, Jharkhand, Ranchi.
4. Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Ranchi.
.... .... .... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner(s) :
For the State
: Mr. Ashish Kumar, AC to SC Mines-III
------
Order No.15/Dated: 05.10.2026
1. On the last two occasions i.e. order dated 18.06.2024 and 08.07.2025, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Further, order dated 03.03.2025 reads as under: - “List this case after three weeks, when the petitioner will produce the notification with document to suggest that he was promoted as Sub-Inspector of Police with effect from 01.10.1981.”
3. The above order has also not been complied with.
4. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. Accordingly, the same is hereby dismissed.
5. However, petitioner is at liberty to file an interlocutory application for revival of the case within six months, if so desires.
6. With above liberty, the present writ petition is disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 05.10.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 06.10.2026