Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./3322/2024 of SHREE NARAYAN VIGYAN PRABHAKAR ALIAS SRINARYAN VIGYAN PRABHAKAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU on 5 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 3322 of 2024 Shree Narayan Vigyan Prabhakar @ Sri Narayan Vigyan Prabhakar, aged about 64 years, S/o Y.K. Verma, resident of Brijnandan Apartment, Flat No. 104, Matwari P.O. & P.S. Sadar, District Hazaribagh. … …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29732
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 3322 of 2024
Shree Narayan Vigyan Prabhakar @ Sri Narayan Vigyan Prabhakar, aged about 64 years, S/o Y.K. Verma, resident of Brijnandan Apartment, Flat No. 104, Matwari P.O. & P.S. Sadar, District Hazaribagh.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through Anti-Corruption Bureau
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Senior Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P.
---
20/05.10.2026
Learned counsels for the parties are present.
2. This petition has been filed for quashing of entire criminal proceeding arising out of A.C.B. Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 09 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A and 120-B of Indian Penal Code and under section 13(2) r/w section 13(1)(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, which is said to be pending in the court of learned District Judge, X cum Special Judge (Vigilance), Dhanbad.
3. After some arguments, when this Court was not inclined to quash the entire criminal proceedings, the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with permission to raise all the points which have been raised in the present petition and also which may be available to the petitioner before the learned court without being prejudice by the withdrawal of this petition.
4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer made.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. It is made clear that withdrawal of this case will not prejudice either party in any manner. It will be open to the petitioner to raise all
2026:JHHC:29732
2
the points which have been raised in the present petition or other points which may be available to the petitioner at appropriate stage.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
8. The interim order passed earlier is vacated.
9. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is closed.
10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through ‘FAX/email’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:05.10.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:06.10.2026