Jharkhand High Court

WPC/7666/2023 of NAWAL PRASAD SINHA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7666 of 2023 ----- 1. Nawal Prasad Sinha, S/o Late Dasrath Lal 2. Sunil Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Bachu Prasad 3. Sandeep Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Shambhu Prasad 4. Satish Kumar Sinha, S/o Sri Jattadhari Prasad All are R/o Village-Bind Mohalla,

2026:JHHC:29586

1 | P a g e

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (C) No. 7666 of 2023

-----

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Nawal Prasad Sinha, S/o Late Dasrath Lal

2. Sunil Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Bachu Prasad

3. Sandeep Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Shambhu Prasad

4. Satish Kumar Sinha, S/o Sri Jattadhari Prasad All are R/o Village-Bind Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.-Chatra, District-Chatra

.......... Petitioners -Versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Deputy Commissioner, Chatra

3. Circle Officer, Chatra

4. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Satya Deo Prasad

5. Niraj Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Bharat Prasad

6. Abhay Kumar Singh, S/o Late Bharat Prasad

7. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Bharat Prasad

8. Subhash Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Bharat Prasad

9. Lakhan Prasad, S/o Late Kashi Prasad

10. Ramchandra Prasad, S/o Late Kashi Prasad

11. Rajkishore Prasad, S/o Late Kashi Prasad

12. Shatrughan Prasad, S/o Late Kashi Prasad

13. Janmyajay Prasad, S/o Devendra Lal Res. Nos. 4 to 13 are R/o Bind Mohalla, P.O., P.S. & District-Chatra

.......... Respondents -----

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC-I

----- Order No.11

Date: 01.10.2026

1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls. Earlier also on 19.08.2026, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the case was adjourned for four weeks.

2. Since no one has been appearing on behalf of the petitioners to press the present writ petition, I see no reason to keep the same pending.

2026:JHHC:29586 2 | P a g e

3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution.

4. I.A. No.17346 of 2025 also stands dismissed.

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

01.10.2026 Vikas/ Uploaded on 05.10.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead