Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9233/2026 of MD TABISH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9233 of 2026 ------ Md. Tabish, aged about 25 years, son of Abdul Ansari @ Munna Ajad @ Manan, resident of Old Purulia Road, Road No.10, Azad Basti, Near Saheli Tailor, P.O.-Azadnagar, Dist.- East Singhbhum, Permanent Address-Guradu
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29537 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9233 of 2026
------ Md. Tabish, aged about 25 years, son of Abdul Ansari @ Munna Ajad @ Manan, resident of Old Purulia Road, Road No.10, Azad Basti, Near Saheli Tailor, P.O.-Azadnagar, Dist.- East Singhbhum, Permanent Address-Guradu Bada, Chakrama, P.O.-Guradu, P.S.-Guradu, Dist.-Gaya, Bihar
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahato, Advocate
: Mr. Akhouri P. Sinha, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01.10.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. No. 371 of 2026 arising out of Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No.31 of 2026 (G.R. No. 28 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under sections 317(4)/317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was receiver of the stolen property which was stolen from the railway passenger. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 07 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-VI, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum, in connection with S.T. No. 371 of 2026 arising out of Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No.31 of 2026 (G.R. No. 28 of 2026) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
01.10.2026 Gunjan-