Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9208/2026 of BASUKU NATH VISHWAKARMA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9208 of 2026 ------ Basuki Nath Vishwakarma age 21 years old wife of late Rishabh Kumar Vishwkarma, resident of Village Bardiha, P.O. & P.S. Bardiha, District Garhwa .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29514] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9208 of 2026
------ Basuki Nath Vishwakarma age 21 years old wife of late Rishabh Kumar Vishwkarma, resident of Village Bardiha, P.O. & P.S. Bardiha, District Garhwa
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-01-10-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bhawnathpur P.S. Case No.75 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 108, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has abetted the commission of suicide of the husband of his sister. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case because of suspicion raised by the father of the deceased only because he is the brother-in-law of the deceased. It is next submitted that the deceased was a businessman suffering from huge loss in his business and because of the same, he has committed suicide but to deprive the sister of the petitioner of her share in the property, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner for the purpose of wreaking vengeance. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 21.09.2026
passed in B.A. No.8794 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.08.2026 as has been mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection with Bhawnathpur P.S. Case No.75 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-01.10.2026-Animesh/