Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5516/2026 of SUNIL YADAV @ SUNIL KUMAR YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5516 of 2026 ------ Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav, S/o Ramesh Yadav, aged about 32 years, R/o Puran Sahibganj, P.O. & P.S.-Sahibganj (T), District- Sahibganj. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29574 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.5516 of 2026
------ Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav, S/o Ramesh Yadav, aged about 32 years, R/o Puran Sahibganj, P.O. & P.S.-Sahibganj (T), District- Sahibganj.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate
: Ms. Ranju Kumari, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 01/10/2026
Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Sahebganj (T) P.S. Case No.123 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and 47(a) of Excise Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale of wine at high price in Bihar. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph-09 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. It is then submitted that the co-accused has already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 24.09.2026 in A.B.A. No.5349 of 2026. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 5,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Sahebganj in connection with Sahebganj (T) P.S. Case No.123 of 2026 subject to the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 01/10/2026 Abhiraj/