Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9235/2026 of ASHISH NISHANT TIRU @ ASHESH TIRU Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9235 of 2026 ------ 1. Ashish Nishant Tiru @ Ashish Tiru, son of Jakarias Tiru, aged about 31 years, resident of Village-Mecon Colony Shyamali, P.O.-Doranda, P.S.-Doranda, Ranchi, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. Aadhar No. 383656069695 2.
( 2026:JHHC:29538 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9235 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ashish Nishant Tiru @ Ashish Tiru, son of Jakarias Tiru, aged about 31 years, resident of Village-Mecon Colony Shyamali, P.O.-Doranda, P.S.-Doranda, Ranchi, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. Aadhar No. 383656069695
2. Parvez Khan, son of Mohammad Riyaz Khan, aged about 30 years, Village-Quazi Manzil, Rahmat Colony, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.-Doranda, Ranchi, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand. Aadhar No.512606093317 … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Ms. Jaya Mishra, Advocate
(Through Video Conferencing) For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01.10.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No.294 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons have cheated the informant of Rs.7,50,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 06.07.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that keeping in view the direct allegation of serious nature against the petitioners of cheating the informant of huge amount of money, there is every chance of the petitioners absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners ought not to be admitted to bail.
Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioners and the chance of the petitioners absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioners on bail.
Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the abovenamed petitioners is rejected.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
01.10.2026 Gunjan-