Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8152/2026 of KUNDAN DAS @ KUNDAN KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8152 of 2026 Kundan Das @ Kundan Kumar Das, aged about 22 years, son of Jhagaru Mahra, resident of Village Jhunaki, P.O. Patharda, P.S. Sarath (Patharda O.P.), District Deoghar, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29604 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8152 of 2026
Kundan Das @ Kundan Kumar Das, aged about 22 years, son of Jhagaru Mahra, resident of Village Jhunaki, P.O. Patharda, P.S. Sarath (Patharda O.P.), District Deoghar, Jharkhand … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Naveen Kumar Ganjhu, Advocate
---
08/01.10.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026, registered under Section 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84(C) of Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two mobiles and two sims are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, both belongs to the petitioner and his father-in-law. He submits that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent only registered under Section 420 of I.P.C. which has been settled. He submits that the memorandum of settlement has been placed on record. Learned counsel further submits that no victim has been identified in the present case and no crime link has been found. The charge-sheet has already been submitted.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail, however, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of ( 2026:JHHC:29604 )
2
Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:01.10.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: