Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9223/2026 of MD. AFSAR ALIAS RISHI @ AFSHAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 1 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9223 of 2026 Md. Afsar @ Rishi @ Md. Afshar, son of Md. Bhola aged about 31 years, village Kub (Masura), P.O. Rewali, P.S. Katkamsandi, District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29601
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9223 of 2026
Md. Afsar @ Rishi @ Md. Afshar, son of Md. Bhola aged about 31 years, village Kub (Masura), P.O. Rewali, P.S. Katkamsandi, District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kr. Nayak, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Prafull Jojo, APP
---
06/01.10.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2026 in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.49/2026, registered under Sections 96, 351 (3), 352, 115 (2), 3 (5) of B.N.S., now pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2026 and charge has been framed on 22.08.2026 and thereafter victim and the informant have been examined before the learned court and both have turned hostile. The learned counsel submits that there is no likelihood of the petitioner tampering with any remaining evidence.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
5. Considering the fact that the most material witnesses i.e. the victim as well as the informant having already been examined, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Balumath P.S. Case 2026:JHHC:29601
No.49/2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:01.10.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:01.10.2026