Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9146/2026 of XXX Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9146 of 2026 XXX … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29463 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9146 of 2026
XXX
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Ms. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P.
---
02/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.07.2026 in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 151 of 2026, registered under Section 69 of the B.N.S, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the F.I.R. itself, the informant is the victim of this case and she is a married lady aged 38 years and allegation has been made that the petitioner has been establishing physical relationship with her on the pretext of marriage and the petitioner happens to be cousin father-in-law of the victim. Learned counsel submits that once the victim is a married lady, there is no question of any kind of physical relationship on the pretext of marriage. He has submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner based on the F.I.R. itself is not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 151 of 2026, on the following ( 2026:JHHC:29463 )
2
conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: