Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8258/2026 of SAHABUDDIN ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8258 of 2026 Sahabuddin Ansari, aged about 32 years, S/o – Kasim Ansari, R/o – Bariyarpur, P.O. + P.S. – Karmatar, District – Jamtara … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29415
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8258 of 2026
Sahabuddin Ansari, aged about 32 years, S/o – Kasim Ansari, R/o – Bariyarpur, P.O. + P.S. – Karmatar, District – Jamtara
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Shweta Singh, APP
---
06/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.35 of 2026, registered under Section 42(3)(e) of Telecommunications Act, 2023 and Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of IT Act, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2026, having no criminal antecedent relating to cyber offence and the charge sheet has already been submitted.
4. Learned counsel for the has further submitted that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent in connection with an offence under the Electricity Act and the same has already been settled. He further submits that so far as present case is concerned, 2 mobile phones and 3 SIM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Out of the 2, one mobile phone and I sim is in the name of the petitioner and no victim has been identified so far.
5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and 2026:JHHC:29415
considering the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent in connection with cyber offence, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.35 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:30.09.2026