Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8257/2026 of WASIM ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8257 of 2026 Wasim Ansari, aged about 21 years, S/o – Kutubuddin Ansari, R/o – Village – Asahana, P.O. + P.S. – Madhupur, District – Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29386
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8257 of 2026
Wasim Ansari, aged about 21 years, S/o – Kutubuddin Ansari, R/o – Village – Asahana, P.O. + P.S. – Madhupur, District – Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, APP
---
06/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.88 of 2026, registered under Sections 111 (2) (b)/111 (3) (4), 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 (2) and 3 (5) of B.N.S. 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D and 84 (C) of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber Crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2026, having no criminal antecedent. It is submitted that 3 mobile phones and 3 SIM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, out of which, 2 SIM cards are in the name of other persons. One victim has been identified to the extent of R.24,025/- and there are 6 crime links.
4. The learned counsel further submits that the charge sheet has already been submitted.
5. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and 2026:JHHC:29386
that charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber Crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.88 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Office is directed to place the case diary received in this case in B.A. No.9221 of 2026, which is already listed tomorrow.
9. Office is also directed to list B.A. No.9309 of 2026, which arises out of the same FIR, tomorrow i.e. on 01.10.2026.
10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:30.09.2026