Jharkhand High Court
C.R./28/2025 of NIRMAL KUMAR KHANDERWAL Vs DHIRENDRA KUMAR JAIN on 30 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C. R. No. 28 of 2025 …. 1. Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal, aged about 75 years, 2. Om Prakash Khandelwal, aged about 73 years Both sons of Late Bhuramal Khandelwal and are residents of shop room no. 13 & 14, Main road near Sadar Police, P.O.
2026:JHHC:29546
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C. R. No. 28 of 2025
….
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal, aged about 75 years,
2. Om Prakash Khandelwal, aged about 73 years Both sons of Late Bhuramal Khandelwal and are residents of shop room no. 13 & 14, Main road near Sadar Police, P.O. P.S. & District: Hazaribagh
……Petitioners
Versus Dhirendra Kumar Jain son of late Sugan Chand Jain resident of Boddam Bazzar, P.O. P.S. & District: Hazaribagh
……Opp. Party
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. A. K. Sahani, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. V. Chaturvedi, Advocate
……
Order No.11/30th September 2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to rectify in provisions of law in page 1 of this civil revision application by red ink.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make rectification in provisions of law in page 1 of this civil revision application.
3. Having heard learned counsel for both the parties, it appears that the petitioner has filed this civil revision application under Section 14(8) of Bihar Building (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982.
4. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision Application No. 28 of 2025 with the liberty to move before the learned Appellate Court under Section 96 of the CPC and has submitted that he may also given liberty to file limitation petition, which
2026:JHHC:29546
may be considered by the learned Appellate Court in accordance with law.
5. However, learned counsel for the opposite party raised no objection on withdrawal of this Civil Revision Application No.28 of 2025 but has submitted that the limitation petition may be considered by the learned Appellate Court in accordance with law.
6. Under the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw this Civil Revision Application No. 28 of 2025 with the aforesaid liberty to move the learned Appellate Court and the learned Appellate Court shall decide the limitation petition on its own merit in accordance with law.
7. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Application No. 28 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty mentioned above.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated :- 30th September, 2026 Nishant/-