Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8448/2026 of IRFAN ANSARI Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8448 of 2026 ------ Irfan Ansari, aged about 35 years, Son of Zakir Ansari, resident of near Jatra Maidan, Lal School Village Patratoli, P.O. and P.S. Kanke, District- Ranchi ..... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29459] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8448 of 2026
------ Irfan Ansari, aged about 35 years, Son of Zakir Ansari, resident of near Jatra Maidan, Lal School Village Patratoli, P.O. and P.S. Kanke, District- Ranchi
..... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-30-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 878 of 2025 arising out of Pithoria P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of Lumba Oraon. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that only because the petitioner was close to the wife of Lumba Oraon and used to visit her house hence it is suspected that he might have murdered Lumba Oraon. So far three witnesses have been examined, but except suspicion no material has come against the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.08.2025 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XII, Ranchi in connection with S.T. Case No. 878 of 2025 arising out of Pithoria P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 30.09.2026 Amar/