Jharkhand High Court

Cr.M.P./2975/2026 of SURAJ KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2975 of 2026 Suraj Kumar, aged about 22 years, S/o – Vinod Saw, R/o – Harihargang, P.O. – Harihargang, P.S. – Harihargang, District - Palamu … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:JHHC:29504

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. M.P. No. 2975 of 2026

Suraj Kumar, aged about 22 years, S/o – Vinod Saw, R/o – Harihargang, P.O. – Harihargang, P.S. – Harihargang, District - Palamu

… … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Sinha (4), Advocate

For the Opposite Party : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, APP

--- 04/30.09.2026

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. This petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 18.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 11095 of 2025, specifically regarding the bail condition contained in paragraph 5(iii), wherein the petitioner was directed to attend the court on each and every date.

3. The bail application was filed by the petitioner in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No. 116 of 2025, which was said to be pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First class, Jamshedpur.

4. Learned counsel for the for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a resident of another district and he is not in a position to incur the expenses to attend the concerned court on every date. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner shall certainly attend the court personally on all material dates and the petitioner may be permitted to attend the court through representation by a counsel on other dates.

5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection so far as the prayer for modification is concerned.

2026:JHHC:29504

6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner happens to be the resident of another district, condition contained in paragraph no.5 (iii) of the order dated 18.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 11095 of 2025, is modified as under: “The petitioner will personally attend the court on material dates and on other dates, he may appear through his counsel.”

7. This petition is accordingly disposed of.

8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through Fax/email.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of order: 30.09.2026 Date of uploading: 01.10.2026 Saurav/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead