Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8271/2026 of CHHATU RAM @ RAVI RAM Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8271 of 2026 ------ Chhatu Ram @ Ravi Ram, aged about 40 years, Son of Mohan Ram, resident of Brahman Tola, Anand Bhawan, Adityapur-1, Post Adityapur, Police Station Adityapur, District- Seraikella Kharsawn. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29499] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8271 of 2026
------ Chhatu Ram @ Ravi Ram, aged about 40 years, Son of Mohan Ram, resident of Brahman Tola, Anand Bhawan, Adityapur-1, Post Adityapur, Police Station Adityapur, District- Seraikella Kharsawn.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kumar Ganjhu, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-03 Dated:-30-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025 (S) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 352, 351(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person attempted to murder informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the allegation of firing is upon the co-accused- Aakash Sardar. Though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.07.2026 as mentioned in para 13 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 23.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6851 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 255 of 2025 (S) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 30.09.2026 Amar/