Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9180/2026 of KEDAR MANDAL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9180 of 2026 ------ Kedar Mandal, Aged about 38 years, Son of Sidhhu Mandal @ Situ Mandal, Resident of Village Badbad, P.O. & P.S.- Chitra, District- Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29405] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9180 of 2026
------ Kedar Mandal, Aged about 38 years, Son of Sidhhu Mandal @ Situ Mandal, Resident of Village Badbad, P.O. & P.S.- Chitra, District- Deoghar
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-30-09-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nala P.S. Case No.36 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of theft of motorcycles and three stolen motorcycles were recovered from his possession. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Dhiren Kumar Mandal. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.08.2026 as has been mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in connection with Nala P.S. Case No.36 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-30.09.2026-Animesh/