Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8290/2026 of MD RAMJAN SHEIKH ALIAS RAMJAN SHEIKH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8290 of 2026 Md. Ramjan Sheikh @ Ramjan Sheikh aged about 20 years son of Md. Enamul Sk., Resident of Village-Taimur Tola P.O. and P.S. Rajmahal, District-Sahibganj … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29444 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8290 of 2026
Md. Ramjan Sheikh @ Ramjan Sheikh aged about 20 years son of Md. Enamul Sk., Resident of Village-Taimur Tola P.O. and P.S. Rajmahal, District-Sahibganj
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…
… Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Ms. Mohua Palit, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate
---
08/30.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 351(2), 352, 115(2), 96, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M. Rajmahal.
3. After some argument, when this court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in view of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application.
4. Learned counsel for the informant and the learned counsel for the State have no objection to the prayer made.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX/e-mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 30.09.2026 Uploaded on 30.09.2026 Binit/