Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./2032/2026 of MUNNA SHARMA @ MUNNA KUMAR SHARMA @ ROHIT Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2032 of 2026 Munna Sharma @ Munna Kumar Sharma @ Rohit, aged about 20 years, S/o Late Haru Sharma, R/o - Village- Ghat Banka, P.O & P.S - Godda (Mufassil), District-Godda, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29469
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 2032 of 2026
Munna Sharma @ Munna Kumar Sharma @ Rohit, aged about 20 years, S/o Late Haru Sharma, R/o - Village- Ghat Banka, P.O & P.S - Godda (Mufassil), District-Godda, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Ms. Juhi Kumari, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl. P.P.
---
13/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This petition has been filed for modification of the bail order dated 12.05.2026 passed by this Court in B.A. No. 2782 of 2026.
3. The bail application was filed by the petitioner in connection with Godda (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. No. 260 of 2025 which was said to be pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Godda.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner does not have any AADHAR and therefore, the condition no. 4(iii) in order dated 12.05.2026 be deleted.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the authorities have verified from the mother of the petitioner regarding the genuineness of the petitioner. She has referred to the Annexure -1 to the supplementary affidavit which is a report of the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Godda.
6. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that if the condition no. 4(iii) is deleted in order dated 12.05.2026, then it may further be observed that one of the bailors would be the mother of the petitioner.
7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the condition no. 4(iii) in order granting bail dated 12.05.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2782
2026:JHHC:29469
2
of 2026 is hereby deleted to the extent it relates to AADHAR Card with a further rider that one of the bailors of the petitioner would be the mother of the petitioner whose bail bond be accepted after due verification.
8. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly disposed of.
9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through ‘FAX/email’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026