Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8259/2026 of SAFAUDDIN ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8259 of 2026 Safauddin Ansari, aged about 20 years, son of Isharuddin Ansari @ Isaruddin Miyan @ Isaruddin, resident of village Barmundi (Bagbair), P.O. Kalajhariya, P.S. Karmatar, District Jamtara, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29424
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8259 of 2026
Safauddin Ansari, aged about 20 years, son of Isharuddin Ansari @ Isaruddin Miyan @ Isaruddin, resident of village Barmundi (Bagbair), P.O. Kalajhariya, P.S. Karmatar, District Jamtara, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, APP
--- 07/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.27 of 2026, registered under Section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 and Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66(B),66(C),66(D) of IT Act, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara.
3. Counter affidavit filed during the court proceeding is taken on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026, having no criminal antecedent. Charge has been framed on 02.09.2026.
5. Learned counsel further submits that 1 mobile phone, 1 SIM card along with 2 ATM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. However, during the investigation, no crime link has been found, no victim has been identified.
6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that charge has already been framed and the 2026:JHHC:29424
petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.27 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:30.09.2026