Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./2306/2026 of SUKU PAHARIYA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2306 of 2026 Suku Pahariya, aged about 25 years, Son of Videshi Pahadiya @ Vidasi Pahadiya, Resident of Village - Chiharpad, P.O. & P.S.-Barhait, District- Sahebganj (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29472
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 2306 of 2026
Suku Pahariya, aged about 25 years, Son of Videshi Pahadiya @ Vidasi Pahadiya, Resident of Village - Chiharpad, P.O. & P.S.-Barhait, District- Sahebganj (Jharkhand).
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, APP
---
10/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This Cr.M.P. has been preferred by the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 15.05.2026 passed by this Court in B.A. No. 4161 of 2026 to the limited extent of modifying Condition No. 6(i) contained therein, whereby both the bailors have been directed to be close relatives of the petitioner.
3. The bail application was filed by the petitioner in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025 which was said to be pending in the court of learned SDJM at Sahibganj.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner is not in a position to furnish bail bond for his own personal reasons and so far as mother of the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner is not aware as to whether she has any property or not.
5. Considering the submissions, the condition of bail as contained in paragraph 6(i) of the order dated 15.05.2026 passed by this Court in B.A. No. 4161 of 2026 is modified as under:
“The petitioner would furnish two bailors”.
6. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly disposed of.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through ‘FAX/email’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026