Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8829/2026 of AKHIL RATHORE @ NANAWAT AKHIL @ N. AKHIL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8829 of 2026 Akhil Rathore @ Nanawat Akhil @ N.Akhil, aged about 26 years, S/o-Nenavath Hanmanthu, Resident of Village-Shivguri, P.O.- Bandamedipally, P.S.-Banda Thanda, District-Mahabubnagar, State- Telangana, 509001 At present
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29382 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8829 of 2026
Akhil Rathore @ Nanawat Akhil @ N.Akhil, aged about 26 years, S/o-Nenavath Hanmanthu, Resident of Village-Shivguri, P.O.- Bandamedipally, P.S.-Banda Thanda, District-Mahabubnagar, State- Telangana, 509001
At present Village-Sindoor, P.O. & P.S.-Korrah, Dist.-Hazaribagh.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalan Kr Singh, Advocate
: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. Ayush Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Advocate
---
02/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2025 in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025, registered under Section 317, 319, 318, 338, 340, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Sections 66C, 66D of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribagh.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2025 and the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier on merits on 13.05.2026 in B.A. No.2721 of 2026. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge was framed much earlier as recorded in order dated 13.05.2026 itself, but till date, only one witness has been examined out of eight.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there were numerous crime links against the petitioner.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner since 24.12.2025 and in spite of charge having been framed on 14.02.2026, only one witnesses has examined so far, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on ( 2026:JHHC:29382 )
2
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribagh in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: