Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/603/2026 of BHEKHLAL MAHTO Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 603 of 2026 ------ 1. Bhekhlal Mahto, aged about 70 years, son of Late Khubhi Devi @ Khubhi Mahto. 2. Chameli Devi, aged about 66 years, wife of Bhekhlal Mahto. 3. Kavita Devi, aged about 43 years, wife of Anil Verma. 4.
( 2026:JHHC:29421 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 603 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Bhekhlal Mahto, aged about 70 years, son of Late Khubhi Devi @ Khubhi Mahto.
2. Chameli Devi, aged about 66 years, wife of Bhekhlal Mahto.
3. Kavita Devi, aged about 43 years, wife of Anil Verma.
4. Radhiya Devi, aged about 33 years, W/o Late Sundar Mahto @ Sundar Verma
5. Ravindra Kumar Verma @ Ravindra Prasad Varma, aged about 35 years, S/o Late Sundar Mahto @ Sundar Verma.
6. Kanchan Devi, aged about 34 years, W/o Ravindra Kumar Verma, All R/o village- Gadi Khurd, P.O. – Gadi Nawdiha, P.S.- Jamua, District- Giridih.
.... .... …. Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Mosomat Draupadi Devi, W/o Late Awadh Kishore Turi, R/o village- Nawdiha, P.O.- Gadi Nawdiha, P.S.- Nawdiha (O.P.) Jamua, District- Giridih (Jharkhand). .... .... .... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Pran Pranay, Adv.
For the State
: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. For the Resp. No. 2 : Ms. Anjali Kumari, Amicus Curiae
------
Order No.05/Dated : 30.09.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. In compliance of the order dated 15.09.2026, Ms. Sabita Kumari, Sub-Inspector, Jamua Police Station, Giridih is physically present before this Court.
3. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 25.05.2026 in A.B.P. No. 402 of 2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST (PoA), Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 301 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case is now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Giridih.
4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal with a liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
5. Learned counsels for the other sides have raised no objection.
( 2026:JHHC:29421 )
6. Permission is accorded.
7. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
8. The personal appearance of the abovementioned official is hereby, dispensed with.
9. Let this order be communicated to the learned Member Secretary, JHALSA, Ranchi, for the purpose of remuneration to be paid to the learned Amicus Curiae as permissible.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 30.09.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 01.10.2026