Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9162/2026 of ASHOK PRAMANIK Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9162 of 2026 Ashok Pramanik, aged about 32 years, son of Piyon Pramanik, resident of Village Tuilung, Dalma, Post Dalma, Police Station Chandil, District Seraikella Kharsawan … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29384
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9162 of 2026
Ashok Pramanik, aged about 32 years, son of Piyon Pramanik, resident of Village Tuilung, Dalma, Post Dalma, Police Station Chandil, District Seraikella Kharsawan
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Ms. Bandana Sinha, APP
---
05/30.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2026 in connection with S.T. Case No. 87 of 2026 arising out of Chandil P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 79 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 80/85/238 / 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, now pending in the Court of Learned District & Addl. Session Judge II at Seraikella.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he happens to be the husband of the deceased.
4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is a direct allegation against the petitioner with regard to demand of dowry and further, the deceased died within 07 years of marriage in her matrimonial home and she was also pregnant.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the direct allegation against the petitioner and the victim died in her matrimonial home within seven years of marriage coupled with the fact that there was demand of dowry, the petitioner being the husband, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and hence, this bail application is rejected.
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026