Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/1072/2023 of KULDIP YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1072 of 2023 --------- 1. Kuldip Yadav aged about 33 year son of Sri Indo Yadav resident of village & P.O.-Parsouni, P.S.-Itkhori, District- Chatra, Jharkhand. 2. Pramod Kumar aged about 45 year son of

Page | 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1072 of 2023

---------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Kuldip Yadav aged about 33 year son of Sri Indo Yadav resident of village & P.O.-Parsouni, P.S.-Itkhori, District- Chatra, Jharkhand.

2. Pramod Kumar aged about 45 year son of Durgeshwari Prasad, resident of village Barari Kendua P.O. & P.S.- Chouparan, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand.

3. Suresh Kumar Gupta aged about 44 year son of Sri Mitan Saw resident of village-Debo, P.O.-Rampur, P.S.- Chouparan, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand.

4. Ram Bharos Yadav aged about 49 year son of late Ram Sawrup Yadav, resident of village-Brahmouriya P.O.- Basariya, P.S.-Chaouparan, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand.

-Petitioners.

-: Versus:-

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. Smt. Naincy Sahay, w/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O., P.S. & District-Hazaribagh.

3. Smt. Abbu Imran, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, P.O., P.S. & District- Chatra.

4. Sri Chandan Kumar, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh, New Samaharnalay Bhawan at Chhatarmandu. P.O., P.S. & District- Ramgarh.

5. Smt. Megha Bhardwaj, w/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma, Samaharnalay Bhawan, Koderma, P.O., P.S. & District- Koderma.

6. Sri Naman Priyesh Lakra, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, P.O., P.S. & District-Giridih.

Page | 2

7. Sri Kupdeep Choudhary, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S.-Chas, District-Bokaro.

8. Sri Varun Ranjan, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District- Dhanbad.

9. Sri Anjaneyulu Dodde, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka, P.O., P.S. & District- Dumka.

10. Sri Vishal Sagar, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District- Deoghar.

11. Sri Faiz Aq Ahmed Mumtaz, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, P.O., P.S. & District- Jamtara.

12. Sri Zeeshan Qamer s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Godda, P.O., P.S. & District- Godda

13. Sri Ramniwas Yadav, s/o not known to the petitioners, The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, P.O., P.S. & District-Sahibganj.

... ... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ----------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate

For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC (L&C) II ---------- 05/Dated: 30th September, 2026

1. Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not intend to press this contempt case since the relief sought in this case has become infructuous. He, therefore, has prayed that the defect may be ignored.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Perused the nature of defect.

Page | 3

4. Considering the same, the defect is hereby ignored.

5. As per the submission made on behalf of petitioner that since the relief sought for in this contempt case has become infructuous, as the grievance made in the writ petition has been redressed since the counseling as per the direction made by the writ court has been conducted, as such he does not want to press this contempt case, the contempt case deserves to be disposed of.

6. Accordingly, the instant contempt case is disposed of being infructuous and as such closed.

7. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 30th September, 2026 Alankar/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead