Jharkhand High Court
Cr.M.P./2888/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 30 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2888 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar, Son of Late Rameshwar Bhuiyan, Aged about 32 years, Resident of Village- Dhori 5 No. Dhaura, P.O. & P.S.- Bermo, District - Bokaro, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29471
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 2888 of 2026
Rajesh Kumar, Son of Late Rameshwar Bhuiyan, Aged about 32 years, Resident of Village- Dhori 5 No. Dhaura, P.O. & P.S.- Bermo, District - Bokaro, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
---
05/30.09.2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha along with Mr. Dilip Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate, is present.
2. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State Mr. Praful Jojo, APP, is also present.
3. Learned counsel for the informant is also present.
4. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
5. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for modification of order dated 07.08.2026 passed by this Court in B.A. No. 7095 of 2026.
6. The bail application was filed by the petitioner in connection with Bermo P.S. Case No. 63 of 2026 which was said to be pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M Bermo at Tenughat.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was inadvertently mentioned that charge-sheet has been submitted, but charge-sheet was not submitted till 07.08.2026.
8. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have opposed the prayer and have submitted that there was a specific stipulation in the order granting bail dated 07.08.2026 and it was made clear that if the charge-sheet had not been submitted by the date of the bail order i.e., 07.08.2026, the petitioner shall not be released. They have opposed the prayer for modification and submit that the petitioner may move afresh before the learned court.
9. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties, this Court is not inclined to modify the order dated 07.08.2026 passed by this Court in B.A. No. 7095 of 2026.
2026:JHHC:29471
2
10. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly dismissed.
11. However, the petitioner may file fresh application seeking bail before the learned court which shall be considered in accordance with law.
12. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through ‘FAX/email’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026