Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(DB)/1229/2026 of MD. SALIM SHEKH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
(DB) No. 1229 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1229 of 2026 Md. Salim Shekh ... ... ... ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29212-DB
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1229 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1229 of 2026 Md. Salim Shekh ... ... ... ... ... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … ... Respondent
--------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SHARMA
--------- For the Appellant: Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent: Spl.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated: 29.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl.P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 02.09.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in connection with Pakur in A.B.P. No. 431 of 2026 in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that, on information that some persons were taking drugs and creating nuisance for the women of the village, a raid was conducted by the police, at which 40-50 persons had assembled and thrown bricks and stones at the police party. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated on the confessional statement of the apprehended accused persons. It has further been submitted that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent. Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant but has submitted that the appellant is named in the confession of the apprehended accused and he was also involved in throwing bricks and stones at the police party being a member of the mob. It appears that there is total dearth of evidence so far as the appellant is concerned as the only incriminating factor against the appellant is the confessional statement of the apprehended accused. It has been stated that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent.
2026:JHHC:29212-DB
2 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1229 of 2026 On consideration of the aforesaid facts, we while setting aside the order dated 02.09.2026 passed in A.B.P. No. 431 of 2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pakur in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026 direct the appellant, named above, to surrender before the learned trial court within a period of four weeks and on his surrender he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026. This appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Ram Sharma, J.) Dated: 29.09.2026 MM/ Cp-03 Uploaded on 01/10/2026