Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/28/2026 of BALBIR KERKETTA Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 28 of 2026 Balbir Kerketta, aged about 56 years, son of Late Emil Kerketta, resident of Hulhundu, P.O. Hulhundu, P.S. Kharsidag, District Ranchi ....Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Rahul Purwar, son of unknown, Secretary,
2026:JHHC:29969
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 28 of 2026
Balbir Kerketta, aged about 56 years, son of Late Emil Kerketta, resident of Hulhundu, P.O. Hulhundu, P.S. Kharsidag, District Ranchi
....Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Rahul Purwar, son of unknown, Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, HEC, Ranchi- 834004, Jharkhand
3. Sudheer Bara, son of unknown, The Director Higher Education, Department of Human Resources, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, HEC, Ranchi-834004, Jharkhand
4. Dr. Gurucharan Sahu, son of unknown, Registrar, Ranchi University, Office at Ranchi University Campus, P.O.-G.P.O. & P.S.-Kotawali, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand
...Opposite parties
-- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-- For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate For the O.P.-University : Mr. Sharen Toppo, A.C to Dr. A.K. Singh, Advocate
-- 03/29.09.2026 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the name of compliance the reasoned order has been passed; however i.e., against the petitioner. Accordingly, the instant application may be disposed of with the liberty to challenge the reasoned order.
2. In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, no contempt is made out and the same is dropped.
3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
29th September, 2026
Jk
Uploaded on
08/10/2026