Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/1039/2024 of SHYAMAL RATHAUR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. (Civil) Case No. 1039 of 2024 --------- 1. Shyamal Rathaur, aged about 27 years, Son of Shri Ramesh Kumar, resident of Ujjwal Bihar, Near S.B.P.School, P.O.- Mahilong, P.S. – Tatisilway, District – Ranchi 2. Dilip Lohra, aged about 30 years, Son
2026:JHHC:29616
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. (Civil) Case No. 1039 of 2024
---------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shyamal Rathaur, aged about 27 years, Son of Shri Ramesh Kumar, resident of Ujjwal Bihar, Near S.B.P.School, P.O.- Mahilong, P.S. – Tatisilway, District – Ranchi
2. Dilip Lohra, aged about 30 years, Son of Etwa Lohra, resident of Village- Kenabhitha, P.O. – Nehalu, P.S. – Bero, District – Ranchi.
3. Kamal Kumar Mahto, aged about 33 years, Son of Rajendra Prasad Mahato, resident of Village – Nawadih, P.O. – Barachangru, P.S. – Silli, District – Ranchi.
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Ms. Vandana Dadel, wife of not known to the petitioner, presently holding the post of Secretary/Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Town and District – Ranchi.
3. Shri Sudhir Kumar Gupta, son of not known to the petitioner, presently holding the post of Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having office at Chai Bagan, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Namkum,Town and District - Ranchi
....Opposite Party(s)
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Tondon, Advocate
Mr. Siddharth Ranjan, Advocate
Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Karamjit S.Chandra, Adovcate For the State
: Mr. Ashok Kumar AAG-IV
Mr. Shishir Suman, AC to AAG-IV For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Jay Prakash,Advocate
--------- 06/Dated:-29.09.2026
1. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by this Court has been set aside.
2. Accordingly, no contempt is made out. As a result, the instant application stands dismissed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 29th, 2026 simran/- uploaded-07.10.2026