Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/975/2025 of ASHISH KUMAR Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 975 of 2025 --------- Ashish Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Anr. …. Opp. Parties ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Mayank, Advocate For the Opp. Parties :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C) No. 975 of 2025 ---------
Ashish Kumar
… Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Anr.
…. Opp. Parties ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Mayank, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V
Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to GA-V ----------- 09/ 09.10.2026 The instant application has been listed on mentioning.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in last line of para-3 of order dated 29.09.2026 passed in Cont. Case (C) No. 975 of 2025, the case number of the writ petition has been wrongly/ inadvertently typed as “W.P.(S). No. 4053 of 2024” instead of “W.P.(S). No. 4052 of 2024”.
3. Accordingly, henceforth in last line of para-3 of the order dated 29.09.2026 passed in Cont. Case (C) No. 975 of 2025, the number of writ petition be read as “W.P.(S). No. 4052 of 2024” instead of “W.P.(S). No. 4053 of 2024”.
4. Let this order be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 29.09.2026, passed in Cont. Case (C) No. 975 of 2025.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 9th October, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded