Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/517/2026 of SAVITA TILMING Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 517 of 2026 --------- 1. Savita Tilming aged about 67 Years W/O Hanuk Purty, Resident of Village Jate Upper Toli, P.O. Jate, P.S.- Murhu, District-Khunti (Jharkhand). 2. Helen Purti @ Helen Purty, aged about 66 Years W/O Athnas Kandir,
2026:JHHC:29524
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 517 of 2026
---------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Savita Tilming aged about 67 Years W/O Hanuk Purty, Resident of Village Jate Upper Toli, P.O. Jate, P.S.- Murhu, District-Khunti (Jharkhand).
2. Helen Purti @ Helen Purty, aged about 66 Years W/O Athnas Kandir, Resident of Village Torpa Road Khunti P.O. & P.S.- Khunti, District-Khunti (Jharkhand).
3. Sudarshan Topno, aged about 66 years, S/o-Junathan Topno, R/o-vill-Gajgaon, P.O. & P.S- Murhu, Dist- Khunti, Jharkhand.
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Shri Shasi Ranjan, The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S Jagannathpur, District -Ranchi cation
3. Shri Abhay Kumar Shil son of Not known to the petitioner, The District Superintendent of Education, Khunti at Khunti, P.O. & P.S.-Khunti, District-Khunti (Jharkhand). ....Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rashika Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, A.C. to G.A.-III
--------- 03/Dated:- 29.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the order has been complied.
2. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding stands dropped. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 09/10/2026