Jharkhand High Court
WPC/7627/2026 of OM PRAKASH RAI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7627 of 2026 ----- 1. Om Prakash Rai, S/o Keshwa Prasad Rai, R/o Flat No. C/GF, Swagatam Apartment, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi 2. Jalaj Kumar, S/o Sri Kaushal Kishore Prasad, R/o Flat No. D 4th Floor,
2026:JHHC:29209
1 | P a g e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 7627 of 2026
-----
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Om Prakash Rai, S/o Keshwa Prasad Rai, R/o Flat No. C/GF, Swagatam Apartment, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi
2. Jalaj Kumar, S/o Sri Kaushal Kishore Prasad, R/o Flat No. D 4th Floor, Swagatam Apartment, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi
3. Ram Pratap Verma, S/o Binay Kumar Verma, R/o Flat No. A/FF, Swagatam Apartment, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi
4. Bibhash Chandra Singh, S/o Late Muralidhar Singh, R/o Flat No. A/4th Floor, Swagatam Apartment, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.-Doranda, District- Ranchi
5. Rajendra Prasad, S/o Late Ramchandra Prasad, R/o Flat No. A/SF, Swagatam Apartment, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi
.......... Petitioners -Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand, through Chief Secretary, Ranchi
2. Secretary, Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
3. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
4. Circle Officer, Argora, Ranchi
5. The Sub-Registrar, Ranchi
.......... Respondents ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Kumar Rahul Kamlesh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.C. to G.A.-V ----- Order No.02
Date: 29.09.2026
1. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, let “the Sub-Registrar, Ranchi” be impleaded as the respondent No. 5 in this case.
2. Office is directed to make necessary correction in the cause title of the present writ petition.
3. After some argument, Mr. Kumar Rahul Kamlesh, learned counsel for the petitioners, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the 2026:JHHC:29209 2 | P a g e
respondent no.5 seeking registration of instruments (if any) with respect to the properties in question.
4. Considering the said prayer, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
5. It is also observed that if registration of instruments with respect to the properties in question presented by the petitioners is refused by the respondent no.5 on the ground that the properties are under the prohibited list, the petitioners will be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
29.09.2026 Vikas/ Uploaded on 29.09.2026