Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8285/2026 of SURAJ KUMAR YADAV @ SURAJ KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8285 of 2026 Suraj Kumar Yadav @ Suraj Kumar, aged about 24 years, S/O Baleshwar Yadav, R/O Village-Danarbad, P.O +P.S. -Chitra, District- Deoghar. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29263
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8285 of 2026
Suraj Kumar Yadav @ Suraj Kumar, aged about 24 years, S/O Baleshwar Yadav, R/O Village-Danarbad, P.O +P.S. -Chitra, District- Deoghar.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, APP
---
03/29.09.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 21.05.2026 in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.78 of 2026, registered under sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 & Sections 66B, 66C, 66D and 84(C) of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum -Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that two mobiles and three SIMs are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, out of which one is in the name of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 21.05.2026.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that charge sheet has already been submitted and two crime links have been found. One victim who has been cheated to the extent of Rs. 58,000/- and odd is alleged to have been identified.
5. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.
6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to
2026:JHHC:29263
2
be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum -Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.78 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:29.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026