Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/292/2025 of VILIYAM TIRKEY Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 292 of 2025 VILIYAM TIRKEY, son of Daniyal Tirkry, aged about 58 years, resident of Kasmar, P.O.- Kasmar, P.S. Kasmar, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Chandra
2026:JHHC:29381
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 292 of 2025
VILIYAM TIRKEY, son of Daniyal Tirkry, aged about 58 years, resident of Kasmar, P.O.- Kasmar, P.S. Kasmar, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand.
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Mr. Chandra Shekhar (IAS), Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration & Land Reform, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi.
3. Mr. Pawan Kumar (IAS), Commissioner, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh.
4. Smt. Jadhav Vijaya Narayan (IAS), Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, District Bokaro.
... Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rinku Bhakat, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Ayush Deb, AC to GP-VI
-------- Order No. 6 /Dated: 29th September 2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though respondent no.3 in the writ petition was directed to pass the reasoned order after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner but as per the show- cause/compliance report filed in this case it appears that respondent no.5- Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro in the writ petition has passed the reasoned order. Accordingly, learned counsel submits that though in a technical sense order passed by the writ Court has not been complied with but since the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro has already passed the reasoned order as such this contempt case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same.
2. Having regard to the above, the instant contempt case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the reasoned order dated 18.08.2026.
3. Pending I.A, if any, also stands disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 29th September 2026 Amit Uploaded on 08/10/2026