Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8328/2026 of SHIVNARAYAN MANDAL @ SHAVNARAIN MANDAL @ SHIVNARIAN MANDAL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8328 of 2026 ------ Shivnarayan Mandal @ Shavnarain Mandal @ Shivnarian Mandal, Aged about – 35 Years, Son of – Late Kalu Mandal, Resident of village- Dergama, Post Office- Mahasinghpur, Police Station:- Rajmahal, District:- Sahibganj .... ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29286] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8328 of 2026
------ Shivnarayan Mandal @ Shavnarain Mandal @ Shivnarian Mandal, Aged about – 35 Years, Son of – Late Kalu Mandal, Resident of village- Dergama, Post Office- Mahasinghpur, Police Station:- Rajmahal, District:- Sahibganj .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated-29-09-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No.111 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 307, 324, 34 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of Gudar Mandal. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 10 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the wife of the deceased who is the eye-witness to the occurrence, has categorically stated that her husband sustained injuries by falling down and became senseless and she cannot say who assaulted her husband and she has been declared hostile and even though the prosecution put leading questions to her still she did not support the case of the prosecution. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No.111 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-29.09.2026-Animesh/