Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5441/2026 of SK. LALAN Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5441 of 2026 ------ Sk. Lalan, aged about 36 years, s/o Sk. Hasem, resident of Village-Jamuria, Hat Tala Para, P.O. & P.S.-Jamuria, Dist.- Paschim Bardhaman (West Bengal) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29273 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5441 of 2026
------ Sk. Lalan, aged about 36 years, s/o Sk. Hasem, resident of Village-Jamuria, Hat Tala Para, P.O. & P.S.-Jamuria, Dist.- Paschim Bardhaman (West Bengal) … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Avishek Chandra, Advocate For the State
: Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 29.09.2026
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Nala P.S. Case No.04 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4/21(4)/21(5) of the M.M.D.R. Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the motorcycle which was seized by the police for being involved in transportation of illegally extracted coal. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-15 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 26.03.2025 in A.B.A. No.2002 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.2,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamtara, in connection with Nala P.S. Case No.04 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
29.09.2026 Gunjan-