Jharkhand High Court
LPA/106/2024 of MS SARAWAGI ENTERPRISES THROUGHI ITS PROPRIETOR SRI RAJEEV SARAWAGI Vs UCO BANK THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER on 29 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 106 of 2024 M/s Sarawagi Enterprises, a proprietorship firm situated at B-20, Mangolia Apartment, Ashiana Gardens, Sonari, P.O. & P.S.- Sonari, Jamshedpur represented through its Proprietor Sri Rajeev Sarawagi, aged about 58
( 2026:JHHC:29231-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 106 of 2024
M/s Sarawagi Enterprises, a proprietorship firm situated at B-20, Mangolia Apartment, Ashiana Gardens, Sonari, P.O. & P.S.- Sonari, Jamshedpur represented through its Proprietor Sri Rajeev Sarawagi, aged about 58 years, son of Late Parmeshwar Dayal Sarawgi, Resident of B-20, Mangolia Apartment, Ashiana Gardens, Sonari, P.O and P.S. Sonari, Town Jamshedpur, District Singbhum East (Jharkhand).
….
….
Appellant
Versus
UCO Bank, through its Branch Manager, having its Main Office at Bistupur, PO &
P.S Bistupur-, Town Jamshedpur, District- Singbhum East (Jharkhand).
….
….
Respondent
------
CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ PRASAD
------
For the Appellant
:
Mr Nitin Kumar Pasari, Advocate
For the Respondents
:
Dr Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate
Mr Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate
Mr Shubham Kumar, Advocate
-----
07 /Dated: 29.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After arguing the matter for some time, Mr Nitin Kumar Pasari, learned counsel for the appellant craves leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a comprehensive petition, including by way of raising a challenge to the Ombudsman’s order dated 31st May, 2026 which, Mr Pasari claims was brought to the knowledge of the appellant only after a counter affidavit is filed in the writ petition.
2. Leave is granted with liberty as prayed for.
3. However, it is clarified that all contentions of all parties including that of the respondents on the ground of delay, laches, maintainability, etc. are explicitly kept open.
4. The appeal is disposed of with liberty in the above teems without any order for costs.
(M.S. Sonak, C.J.)
(Manoj Prasad, J.) September 29, 2026 Ranjeet / R.Kr. NAFR / uploaded on 30.09.26