Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9123/2026 of NITESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS NITESH YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9123 of 2026 ------ Nitesh Kumar Yadav @ Nitesh Yadav, aged about 21 years, S/o Madan Kumar Yadav R/o of Vill.- Dropad, P.O.- Durpat, Latta, P.S.- Poraiyahat, District- Godda, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29252] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9123 of 2026
------ Nitesh Kumar Yadav @ Nitesh Yadav, aged about 21 years, S/o Madan Kumar Yadav R/o of Vill.- Dropad, P.O.- Durpat, Latta, P.S.- Poraiyahat, District- Godda, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Choudhary, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-29-09-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No.75 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 109 & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25(1-B) (a), 26 and 27/35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant- Anupam Kumar. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused. It is next submitted that nobody has sustained any injury as the bullet did not hit the target. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.08.2026 as has been mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No.75 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-29.09.2026-Animesh/