Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9023/2026 of SHAKTI CHOUDHARY @ SHAKTI CHOUDHARI Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9023 of 2026 ------ 1. Shakti Choudhary @ Shakti Choudhari, aged about 25 years, Son of Binod Choudhary. 2. Deepak Choudhary @ Deepak Choudhari, aged about 23 years, Son of Shyam Sundar Choudhary, Both are residents of Village Khutabandh,
[2026:JHHC:29187]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9023 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shakti Choudhary @ Shakti Choudhari, aged about 25 years, Son of Binod Choudhary.
2. Deepak Choudhary @ Deepak Choudhari, aged about 23 years, Son of Shyam Sundar Choudhary, Both are residents of Village Khutabandh, P.O.- Motileda & P.S. Bengabad, District- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-29-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jainagar (Telaiya Dam O.P.) P.S. Case No.88 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in theft of motorcycle. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is also submitted that though charge-sheet has been submitted but none of the witnesses have been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 11.06.2026 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Jainagar (Telaiya Dam O.P.) P.S. Case No.88 of 2025 with the condition that they will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 29.09.2026 Amar/