Jharkhand High Court

MA/228/2026 of BALDEV MAHATO Vs RASH BIHARI MAHATO on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Miscellaneous Appeal No. 228 of 2026 ------ 1. Baldev Mahato, son of Late Nakul Mahato, aged about 43 years 2. Gunadhar Mahato, aged about 40 years 3. Sonu Mahato, aged about 33 years Sl. Nos.2 and 3 are sons of Late Jhagru Mahato 4. Smt. Shakuntala Mahato,

2026:JHHC:29258

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Miscellaneous Appeal No. 228 of 2026

------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Baldev Mahato, son of Late Nakul Mahato, aged about 43 years

2. Gunadhar Mahato, aged about 40 years

3. Sonu Mahato, aged about 33 years Sl. Nos.2 and 3 are sons of Late Jhagru Mahato

4. Smt. Shakuntala Mahato, daughter of Jhagru Mahato, aged about 33 years All residents of Village Kocha Bazar, P.O. Luabasa, P.S. Govindpur, District East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur ....

…. Appellants

Versus

1. Rash Bihari Mahato

2. Ban Bihari Mahato

3. Goverdhan Mahato Sl. Nos.1 to 3 are sons of Late Surendra Mahato

4. Haripado Mahato

5. Jasharath Mahato

6. Haradhan Mahato Sl. Nos.4 to 6 are sons of Late Dhiru Mahato

7. Santosh Mahato, son of Late Giri Mahato

8. Natabar Mahato, son of Late Lakhindr Mahto

9. Guru Pada Mahato, son of Late Rajan Mahato

10. Shankar Mahato, son of Late Prafulla Mahato

11. Vikash Mahato, son of Late Nagen Mahato

12. Amulya Mahato, son of Late Prem Chand Mahato

13. Surendra Mahato, son of Late Prem Chand Mahato

14. Ashok Mahato, son of Late Rash Bihari Mahato

15. Rajan Mahato, son of Late Mahendra Mahato

16. Ratan Mahato, son of Late Mahendra Mahato

17. Arjun Mahato, son of Late Murli Mahato

18. Ram Mahato, son of Makund Mahato

19. Ludhu Mahato, son of Late Bhushan Mahato All residents of Village Kocha Bazar, P.O. Luabasa, P.S. Govindpur, District East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur

Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

For the Appellants

: Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :

------

02/29.09.2026 This appeal has been preferred under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the order dated 24th February, 2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)-IX, Jamshedpur in Original Suit No.282 of 2019 whereby petition filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been dismissed by the learned court.

2. Mr. Jitesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal as the appeal has become infructuous.

3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

Dated 29.09.2026 Anit Uploaded 07.10.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead