Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9127/2026 of IRFAN ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9127 of 2026 ------ Irfan Ansari, aged about 26 years, Son of Baris Ansari, Permanent Residence of Village- Pachaura Basti, P.O. Baidhmara, P.S. Harla, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand, Present Residence of Village- Madhuniya, P.O.- Alkusha, P.S.- Siyaljori,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29251] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9127 of 2026
------ Irfan Ansari, aged about 26 years, Son of Baris Ansari, Permanent Residence of Village- Pachaura Basti, P.O. Baidhmara, P.S. Harla, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand, Present Residence of Village- Madhuniya, P.O.- Alkusha, P.S.- Siyaljori, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-29-09-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Complaint Case (Excise Act) No.468 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 47(b), 47(e), 52(d), 55 of the Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of huge amount of wine distilled illegally by the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovered materials. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.08.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 10 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C, Bokaro in connection with Complaint Case (Excise Act) No.468 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-29.09.2026-Animesh/