Jharkhand High Court
Cr.A(SJ)/76/2026 of RAMDEO YADAV Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 29 September 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 76 of 2026 ------ Ramdeo Yadav, aged about 37 years, son of Mahadev Yadav, resident of village- Karnodih, P.O. – Keshwari, P.S.- Sariya, District- Giridih. .... .... …. Appellant(s) Versus 1. The State of
( 2026:JHHC:29203 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 76 of 2026
------
Ramdeo Yadav, aged about 37 years, son of Mahadev Yadav, resident of village- Karnodih, P.O. – Keshwari, P.S.- Sariya, District- Giridih.
....
....
….
Appellant(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Bhudhan Birhor, Son of Late Charka Birhor, resident of Birhor Colony, P.O. & P.S.- Sariya, District- Giridih.
.... .... .... Respondent(s)
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. For the Resp. No. 2 : Ms. Ishani Sen, Amicus Curiae
------
Order No.10/Dated : 29.09.2026
1. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 27.11.2025 in A.B.P. No. 1955 of 2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST (PoA), Giridih in connection with Giridih (SC/ST) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(f) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case is now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Giridih.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal.
3. Learned counsels for the other sides have raised no objection.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Let this order be communicated to the learned Member Secretary, JHALSA, Ranchi, for the purpose of remuneration to be paid to the learned Amicus Curiae as permissible.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 29.09.2026 Vedanti/ Uploaded on 30.09.2026