Jharkhand High Court
WPC/5277/2024 of MANOJ KUMAR SAH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 5277 of 2024 ---------- Manoj Kumar Sah, aged about 51 years, s/o. Raghunath Prasad Sah, R/o. Shiv Pahar Chowk, Near Muffsil Thana, P.O. Dumka, P.S. Dumka, Town & Dist. Dumka. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand
2026:JHHC:29049
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S). No. 5277 of 2024
----------
Manoj Kumar Sah, aged about 51 years, s/o. Raghunath Prasad Sah, R/o. Shiv Pahar Chowk, Near Muffsil Thana, P.O. Dumka, P.S. Dumka, Town & Dist.
Dumka.
……….
Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur & District -Ranchi.
2. The Principal Secretary, School, Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand having office at Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District- Ranchi.
3. The Director, Primary Education, School, Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District-Ranchi.
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, P.O., P.S. & District-Chatra.
5. The District Superintendent of Education, Chatra, P.O., P.S. & District- Chatra.
6. The District Establishment Committee, Chatra through its President, P.O., P.S. & District- Chatra.
………. Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV
---------- 03/ 28.09.2026 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
2. There is no objection from the respondents.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 28th September, 2026 Kunal/ Uploaded 29.09.2026