Jharkhand High Court

W.P.(Cr.)/164/2026 of PRATISH SWETABH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

No. ( 2026:JHHC:29135 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 164 of 2026 Pratish Swetabh, S/o Durga Prasad, R/o Bauli Tola, Sahu Chowk, P.O.- Pundag, P.S.- Argora, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand ... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General of

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:29135 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(Cr.) No. 164 of 2026

Pratish Swetabh, S/o Durga Prasad, R/o Bauli Tola, Sahu Chowk, P.O.- Pundag, P.S.- Argora, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand

... … Petitioner

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand

3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi

4. The City Superintendent of Police, Ranchi

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hatia

6. The Office-in-Charge of Jagarnathpur (Pundag) Police Station, P.O. + P.S.- Jagarnathpur (Pundag), District-, Ranchi, Jharkhand

... … Respondents

---------

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Aaryamann Relan, Adv. For the Respondents : A.C. to Sr. A.A.G.

---------

02/28.09.2026 Heard Mr. Aaryamann Relan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to Sr. A.A.G. for the respondents.

In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to take appropriate action against all the accused persons in connection with Jagarnathpur (Pundag O.P.) P.S. Case Nos. 272/2019, 273/2019, 389/2020 and Kotwali P.S. Case No. 259/2021. The petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondents to conclude the investigation in the aforesaid cases.

Considering the prayer of the writ-petitioner reference is made to the case of “Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. and Ors.”, reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409, wherein it has been held as follows: “26. If a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police station his first remedy is to approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) CrPC or other police officer referred to in Section 36 CrPC. If despite approaching the Superintendent of Police or the officer referred to in Section 36 his grievance still persists, then he can approach a Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC instead of rushing to the High Court by way of a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 CrPC. Moreover, he has a further remedy of filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 CrPC. Why then should writ petitions or Section 482 petitions be entertained when there are so many alternative remedies?

27. As we have already observed above, the Magistrate has very wide powers to direct registration of an FIR and to ensure a proper investigation and for this purpose he can monitor the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly (though he cannot investigate himself). The High Court should discourage the practice of filing a writ petition or petition under Section 482 CrPC simply because a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police, or after being registered, proper investigation has not been done by the police. For this grievance, the remedy lies under Sections 36 and 154(3) before the police officers concerned, and if that is of no avail, under Section 156(3) CrPC before the Magistrate or by filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 CrPC and not by filing a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 CrPC.”

In view of the remedy available to the petitioner, this writ application accordingly stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail of the said remedy.

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)

Dated, the 28th September, 2026 A. Sanga/- Uploaded on 29 /09/2026

-2-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead