Jharkhand High Court

Cr.A(SJ)/747/2025 of LAXMAN MANDAL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 747 of 2025 1.Laxman Mandal age 27 years old son of Sudam Mandal 2.Lakhi Mandal @ Lakhi Kr. Mandal age 26 years old son of Sudam Mandal 3.Chotu Mandal aged 23 years old son of Sudam Mandal 4.Sudam Mandal age 76 years old son of late Kartik

2026:JHHC:29081

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 747 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Laxman Mandal age 27 years old son of Sudam Mandal

2. Lakhi Mandal @ Lakhi Kr. Mandal age 26 years old son of Sudam Mandal

3. Chotu Mandal aged 23 years old son of Sudam Mandal

4. Sudam Mandal age 76 years old son of late Kartik Mandal

5. Jainty Devi @ Jayanti Devi age 64 years old wife of Sudam Mandal All are resident of village Malihatola, P.O. & P.S. Rajmahal, District Sahibganj

…....... Appellant(s)

Vrs.

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Victim

........ Respondent(s)

…....

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

For the Appellant(s)

: Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P. For the Resp. No.2

: Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate

Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate

09/28.09.2026 In pursuance of the order dated 31.08.2026, Mr. Hasnain Ansari, Sub Inspector cum Officer-Incharge, Rajmahal P.S. and Mr. Mahadeo Oraon, Sub Inspector cum Investigating Officer, Rajmahal P.S. are physically present today to assist the Court in the matter.

2. The present criminal appeal is directed against the order dated 27.01.2025 passed in A.B.P. No. 520 of 2024 by the court of learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Sahibganj in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024 for the offence registered under Section 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 303(2), 76, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S 2023 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act whereby the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected. The case is pending in the court of learned Special Judge SC/ST Court, Sahibganj.

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the other side have not raised any objection.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

6. Personal appearance of the aforesaid police personnels is hereby dispensed with.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 23 .09.2026 A. Mohanty

Uploaded ____/____/2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead