Jharkhand High Court

WPC/6086/2024 of ARUN KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6086 of 2024 --------- Arun Kumar Das, aged about 40 years, son of Madhu Sudan Das, resident of village Sarasdangal, P.O. Sarasdangal, P.S. Sikaripara, District Dumka, Jharkhand. ......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the

2026:JHHC:29079

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (S) No. 6086 of 2024

---------

Arun Kumar Das, aged about 40 years, son of Madhu Sudan Das, resident of village Sarasdangal, P.O. Sarasdangal, P.S. Sikaripara, District Dumka, Jharkhand.

......Petitioner(s)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand having its office at M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.

2. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.Ο. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.

3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S. - Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad.

4. The District Education Officer, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District - Dhanbad.

5. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad.

.....Respondent(s)

---------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate

Mr. Yogendra Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. Oishi Das, A.C. to A.G.

--------- 03/Dated:-28.09.2026

1. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.

2. There is no objection from the respondents.

3. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.

(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 08/10/2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead