Jharkhand High Court
W.P.(Cr.)/312/2026 of AMIT BANSAL ALIAS AMIT KUMAR BANSAL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026
Citation 2026:JHHC:29100 Page 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 312 of 2026 Amit Bansal @ Amit Kumar Bansal, R/o Mangalam Tower No. 12, Flat No. 1274, Tata kandra Main Road, Near Sudha Dairy, Adityapur, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, Dist.- Seraikella- Kharsawan. --- ---
Neutral Citation
2026:JHHC:29100
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (Cr.) No. 312 of 2026
Amit Bansal @ Amit Kumar Bansal, R/o Mangalam Tower No.
12, Flat No. 1274, Tata kandra Main Road, Near Sudha Dairy, Adityapur, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, Dist.- Seraikella- Kharsawan.
---
--- Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Seraikella- Kharsawan.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Seraikella- Kharsawan
4. The Inspector cum Officer-in-Charge, Adityapur P.S., Seraikella- Kharsawan.
--- --- Respondents
--- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Srivastava, Adv.
For the State : Mrs. Sunita Kumari, AC to Sr. S.C.-II --- 02/28.09.2026 Heard Mr. Vishal Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to Sr. S.C.-II.
In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to comply with the order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella- Kharsawan in connection with Complaint Case No. 391/2024.
It appears that the petitioner had instituted a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act. After cognizance was taken, summons were issued upon accused Binod Kumar Saini and since he did not appear, non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against him which according to learned counsel for the petitioner is not being executed by the respondent nos. 2-4.
Since the grievance of the petitioner can very well be redressed before the concerned court, this writ application accordingly stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned court for redressal of his grievance.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated- 28th September, 2026. Preet/- Uploaded on: 28 /09/2026.