Jharkhand High Court
WPC/6284/2024 of ASHIM KUMAR BHUI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6284 of 2024 --------- Ashim Kumar Bhui, aged about 41 years, S/o Amiya Lal Bhui, R/o Village- Manusmuria, P.O. Manusmuria, P.S. Barsole & District- East Singhbhum. ......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary,
2026:JHHC:29114
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 6284 of 2024
---------
Ashim Kumar Bhui, aged about 41 years, S/o Amiya Lal Bhui, R/o Village- Manusmuria, P.O. Manusmuria, P.S. Barsole & District- East Singhbhum.
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur & District -Ranchi.
2. The Principal Secretary, School, Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand having office at Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District- Ranchi.
3. The Director, Secondary Education, School, Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District-Ranchi.
4. The Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, P.O., P.S. & District- West Singhbhum.
5. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, P.O., P.S. & District- East Singhbhum.
6. The District Education Officer, West Singhbhum, P.O., P.S. & District- West Singhbhum.
7. The District Education Officer, East Singhbhum, P.O., P.S. & District- East Singhbhum.
.....Respondent(s)
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to G.P.-VI
--------- 05/Dated:-28.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been recommended for transfer from West Singhbhum to East Singhbhum; however, the same was not implemented.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that a counter affidavit has been filed wherein at paragraph-18 it has been stated that the petitioner is not entitled for transfer to his own district in terms of transfer policy of the State Government.
3. Having regard to the above, no relief can be granted to this petitioner; accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed. Pending I.A., if any also stands closed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 08/10/2026