Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8980/2026 of XAVIER HEMBROM Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8980 of 2026 Xavier Hembrom, aged about- 30 years Son of Ignatious Hembrom, Resident of Village- Khuthari, P.O. Dighi, P.S. Meharama, District- Godda. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8980 of 2026
Xavier Hembrom, aged about- 30 years Son of Ignatious Hembrom, Resident of Village- Khuthari, P.O. Dighi, P.S. Meharama, District- Godda.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Ramchander Sahu, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, APP
---
04/28.09.2026
Learned counsels for the parties are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.08.2026 in connection with Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025, registered under Sections 81, 89, 115(2), 126(2), 351(1), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Sahibganj.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that both the victim and the petitioner are major and it is alleged against the petitioner that he exploited the victim for 10 years on false pretext of marriage.
4. Learned counsel for the informant submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is released on bail.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has submitted that if the informant has no objection to the prayer for bail, he has nothing to say.
6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties, as per the allegation, the petitioner and the victim were having relationship for the last 10 years and it is alleged that the relationship was established on false pretext of marriage. The informant of the case has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the
2026:JHHC:29026
2
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:28.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.10.2026