Jharkhand High Court
WPC/5918/2024 of SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5918 of 2024 --------- Shravan Kumar Singh aged about 37 years S/o Late Surendra Singh resident of Police Line Po- Hazaribag Ps-Sadar Dist- Hazaribag (Jharkhand). ......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Inspector general
2026:JHHC:29065
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 5918 of 2024
---------
Shravan Kumar Singh aged about 37 years S/o Late Surendra Singh resident of Police Line Po- Hazaribag Ps-Sadar Dist- Hazaribag (Jharkhand).
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Deputy Inspector general of Police (Personnel), Police Head Quarters, PO+PS-Dhurwa Dist- Ranchi ( Jharkhand)
3. The Inspector general of Police (Training) Police Head Quarters, PO+PS- Dhurwa Dist- Ranchi (Jharkhand)
4. The Superintendent of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police-7, JAP Campus, Padma PO+PS-Padma, Dist.-Hazaribag (Jharkhand)
5. The Superintendent of Police, Hazaribag SP Office new Collecteriat, PO-Hazaribag PS-Sadar Dist.-Hazaribag (Jharkhand).
.....Respondent(s)
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Rohit Ranajan,
Animesh Kumar Bhaiya, Advocates For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to S.C.(Mines)-III
--------- 06/Dated:-28.09.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner for quashing the order dated 30.11.2022 issued by the 3rd respondent whereby the 3rd respondent has wrongly transferred the Petitioner Constable 1056 from Hazaribagh District Force to Jharkhand Armed Police.
3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that though the transfer was made contrary to Rule 778 (x) of the Jharkhand Police Manual and Guidelines of the Government that any Police Personnel cannot be transferred from District Force to Jharkhand Armed Police, however, since there was no stay of the impugned order of transfer, he joined the transferred place; as 2026:JHHC:29065
such, interest of justice would be sufficed by granting a liberty to the petitioner to approach the 3rd Respondent to raise his grievance with regard to transfer.
4. There is no objection from the respondents.
5. Having regard to the above, no relief can be granted to the petitioner; accordingly, the instant writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the 3rd Respondent to raise his grievance with regard to transfer, if so advised.
6. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 09/10/2026